*******Paranormal Points to Ponder : Big Foot

Image via Wikipedia
Does Big Foot exist?
There are compelling arguments on both sides of the coin. Some say that the lack of any physical evidence is proof enough that this creature does not exist. However, on the flip side of this point, is the fact there are also very few examples of physical evidence of many species of wildlife residing in the remote areas of the county and world.

The famed Patterson-Gimlin film shot by Roger Patterson and Robert Gimlin has been scrutinized by the finest minds in the world for legitimacy and no details have been overlooked. Several key issues that make for a compelling argument of authenticity of the footage is the quality of the gorilla-type suit in the footage. Taken in 1967.

We can certainly go back through film archives and find examples of gorilla suits and one thing you will not see is suits designed as realistically as this suit was. On top of that, the creature appearing in the Patterson film appears to have breasts. No one of that time period would have thought to add "breasts" to any suit. It's just doubtful, highly doubtful.

There have been documented cases of Bigfoot sightings since 1924. Prior to 1924, Natives of North America have recorded and handed down many stories of the "wild man" they called Sasquatch. To the Native Americans, this is no hoax, but a very real mystical creature with special abilities to appear and disappear at will.
We leave the debate here. Does Bigfoot deserve more study? Or should this creature and man's supposed need to have larger-than-life mysteries, belong in fairy tales and campfire stories?