There are a lot of so called orbs that indeed may be dust, and there are a lot of dust that may actually be an orb. I find the most compelling argument that a photographed orb is not "dust" is when it has a few factors taken into consideration. Questions one needs to ask themselves.
Did the dust show up in subsequent photographs or in a sequence of photographs taken in the same conditions, same position with the same lighting and same camera?
Have there been any recent losses in the family and is the area,room. Do you know if previous owners died in the home?
If you answered yes to more than a one of these questions, I am more inclined to believe you have captured a spirit orb. I for one believe that when you have a legitimate reason to believe an orb is not dust, or as some call them just "balls of energy and not a spirit" you are claiming to "know" something without being able to prove why you "know" this.
All of which were not in the very next photo taken. Now I was in a mobile home, there was no lights on, and no odd movements. Just two photographs of my mom, one had the three orbs, one did not. They were taken within seconds of each other. You can take a hundred different photos, and never get any orbs, but oddly enough when you do someone is just sure it is "dust".
Now what made the three orbs in my photo remarkable? They were taken a few months after I lost my dad, and two brothers. Oddly enough, they were all different sized human beings. One really large, the next somewhat smaller in weight, and the third smaller still. I know, it's dust..yeah
Related articles
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments that are spam get deleted. For everyone else, thank you for taking time to give us your thoughts :-)